| 
           |    
               
              Recent articles in the SF Chronicle  by David Helvarg(“Don't gamble with Point Molate” and  “Build  Waterfront Park, Not Homes, at Point Molate”) both copied at the end of this  email, are gross misrepresentations of reality and are part of a recent frenzy  to protect Point Molate from a non-existent threat. 
               
              Mr. Helvarg seems to be totally  confused about what is going on with Point Molate. He seems to believe that  Point Molate is still being considered as the location for a casino. Helvarg  writes, “…the City Council could vote to transfer Point Molate's title to  Upstream LLC, a consortium put together by a Berkeley developer who also  represents a small band of Pomo Indians that he hopes will become California's  next gaming tribe.” 
               
              The fact is that the casino proposal  has been dead since 2011, and it is not coming back. 
               
              We also had a number of speakers at  City Council meeting last Tuesday night, most accusing the City Council of  making some kind of secret deal with Jim Levine. This myth is being largely  pushed by the RPA, with Gayle McLaughlin  stating, “Many feel strongly  that the City Council is heading back into those historically corrupt days in  Richmond before some of us got involved. Richmond was known, in those days, for  handling big issues behind closed doors.” 
               
              As much as we appreciate the RPA for  single-handedly saving us from those “historically corrupt days in Richmond,”  Mc Laughlin knows better. No decision has been made by the Richmond City  Council other than to simply hear what Levine has to say. 
               
              What we are  seeing is the manifestation in emails to Council members, public speakers at  City Council meetings and newspaper articles planted by the RPA, of a subtle  agenda to make drastic changes to the vision of Point Molate’s future that has  endured for nearly twenty years. Next to doing nothing at Point Molate, the RPA  and their collaborating activists appear to be dead set against any housing at  Point Molate and are suspicious of any economic activity at all.  
               
              Mr. Helvarg  appears to be the media spokesperson for that agenda, but it’s not even clear  what he wants to see at Point Molate. He cites the Presidio and Ft. Baker (now  called Cavallo Point) as examples we  should follow, and they are both excellent ones. Helvarg writes, “I'm thinking  this could be the third emerald jewel of bayfront green parks, along with the  Presidio of San Francisco and Fort Baker in Marin County. Unfortunately, with  its multimillion-dollar views of San Francisco Bay and Mount Tamalpais, Point  Molate has generated a more predictable plan.” 
               
              Neither  Cavallo Point nor the Presidio, however, are undeveloped parklands. Cavallo  Point incudes a large conference center, hotel restaurant and bars along with  the Bay Area Discovery Museum and a marina. Helvarg, along with anti-housing  Point Molate activists, eschews housing at Point Molate, but apparently is not  aware that his beloved Presidio has 3,000 people living in 1,200 housing units  in in 21 neighborhoods. 
               
              Turning Point Molate into one giant  park with decaying ruins of a National Register Historic District is clearly  not what former Congressman Ron Dellums had in mind when he authored the DOD  Authorization for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106), signed into law by  President Clinton. The Dellums legislation permitted DOD to convey Point Molate  to the City of Richmond at no cost. The conveyance was, however, not without  conditions. One of the conditions required use of the parcel for “economic  development.” 
            
              CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance  authorized under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that the  City, directly or through an agreement with a public or private 
                entity, use the conveyed property (or offer  the conveyed property or use) for economic redevelopment to replace all  or a part of the economic activity being lost at the parcel. 
               
                            Self-appointed critics of development  at Point Molate have also been dismissive of the 1997 Reuse  Plan, but after nearly 20 years it remains an excellent guide. The plan was  required by the Navy as a condition of transfer, as was a 25-person Blue Ribbon  Committee to advise on its preparation. Ultimately, it was approved unanimously  by the City Council. 
                 
                In its “Vision” statement the Reuse  Plan states:
             Point Molate will play an important role in  enhancing the economic base of Richmond, enhancing Richmond’s regional  presence, expanding open space and recreational opportunities and creating a  new City neighborhood with a mix of uses…The overall vision, thematic  concepts, and specific recommendations of the Plan are consistent with  President Clinton’s Five Point Plan for achieving successful conversion and  reuse of military bases, which emphasizes job creation and economic  development. 
                A number of years ago, the City  Council adopted The Ahwahnee  Principles as a design guide, and those Principles are cited in the General  Plan 2030 (General Plan 2030 (Introduction – Shaping the New 100 Years, page 9)  as a basis for the General Plan. The first Ahwahnee Principle is: 
                 
              All planning should be in the form of complete  and integrated communities containing housing, shops, work places, schools,  parks and civic facilities essential to the daily life of the residents.                What Helvarg  says he wants to do is totally consistent with both the 1997 Reuse Plan and  even Upstream’s opening proposal: 
               
              A  far more credible plan might focus on Point Molate’s existing historic district  that could and should be repurposed from the state’s original wine industry  port (not far from the state’s last whaling station) to something both useful  and fabulous. This 20-acre plus site includes the red brick Winehaven Castle  and an adjacent turn-of-the-20th-century workers village. It has potential for  a Mount Tamalpais-bayview hotel, food and wine retail shops, start-up offices,  a plant nursery, nature center, etc. As a visitor destination, it would have  increased value being surrounded by a waterfront park, an extended Bay Trail,  hiking trails, native grasslands and family camping sites. 
            
              Another thing Helvard wrote about is  the myth that deep pocketed organizations are beating down our door to invest  in Point Molate. He writes: 
               
              Among  those who have expressed interest in managing these natural treasures are the  East Bay Regional Parks District and the Trust for Public Lands, while San  Francisco State’s Romberg Marine Lab and the nonprofit Watershed Project hope  to continue to study and restore Point Molate’s offshore eelgrass beds and  historic oyster reefs. A coalition of Richmond and Bay Area political and  conservation groups are also coalescing in opposition to the mayor’s planned  housing deal with a developer whose previous plans were overwhelmingly rejected  by voters.               As far as I know, the East Bay  Regional Park District has not offered a penny to manage anything at Point  Molate. This coalition Helvarg speaks about is long on “no” and short on both  money and action. 
               
              Point Molate should be envisioned as a neighborhood, not just an enclave where the gates are locked at sundown.  Including a significant residential component will give Point Molate a critical  mass that will make it a 24/7 community, not just a place. Residents will  provide the critical “eyes on the street,” to quote perhaps America’s most  famous planner, Jane Jacobs, in “The Death and Life of Great American Cities.” 
               
              Point Molate is no longer just a  place, it’s become a game of political football where political factions are  vying to see who can score the most points. 
                             
                 
               
              Above, Cavallo Point (formerly Ft. Baker) 
                             
                
               
              Above, the 1997 Point  Molate Reuse Plan includes most of the features both the Presidio and   Cavallo Point, including hotels, housing, commercial ventures, parks and open  space.  
               
              Don't gamble  with Point MolateDavid Helvarg 
                             
              Published  4:00 am, Friday, January 8, 2010                
               
                
              Photo:  Frederic Larson, The Chronicle  
               
              As a Richmond  resident, it took me some time to discover one of my city's treasures, the  headlands north of the Richmond Bridge known as Point Molate, 422 acres of  spectacular bay-facing green space and submerged eel grass meadows that my City  Council wants to sell off for a gambling casino. 
               
              Point Molate is  the site of an historic wine port that later became part of a Navy fuel oil  depot before the U.S. Navy sold it to the city for $1 in 2003. It  is an example of the resiliency of nature left unpaved, rapidly reclaiming its  terrestrial area as hilly coastal grassland, range-managed by mule deer with  colossal toyons - Christmas berry shrubs - the size of live oaks, also live  oaks, federally protected Suisun marsh aster, native Molate blue fescue, a  unique bunchgrass horticulturists have bred for landscaping, coyote brush, wild  mint, Dutchman's pipe vine and its rarely seen companion, the pipe vine  swallowtail butterfly. "This is the most beautiful area imaginable for  grassland geeks," botanist Lech Naumovich, who is showing me around, grins  happily. 
               
              I'm thinking  this could be the third emerald jewel of bayfront green parks, along with the  Presidio of San Francisco and Fort Baker in Marin County. Unfortunately, with  its multimillion-dollar views of San Francisco Bay and Mount Tamalpais, Point  Molate has generated a more predictable plan. 
               
              Sometime in the  next 10 weeks, and despite opposition from Richmond's mayor, the governor, the  state's two U.S. senators, and what seems to be a lot of Richmond residents,  the City Council could vote to transfer Point Molate's title to Upstream LLC, a  consortium put together by a Berkeley developer who also represents a small  band of Pomo Indians that he hopes will become California's next gaming tribe. 
               
              Upstream has  already paid the city a $15 million nonrefundable deposit toward a possible $50  million purchase price, promising to build the most eco-sustainable casino,  hotel and housing complex this side of Las Vegas.  
               
              The developer  has promised tens of millions more dollars from imagined future gambling  revenues to the city, county, environmental critics and others. Along with the  land transfer, Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar would have to agree to convert Point  Molate into reservation land for urban gaming. If he doesn't, Upstream could  turn around and sell the land to a third party, such as Chevron Corp., which  has a huge production facility just over the ridgeline. 
               
              Some on the City  Council seem to take the promise of casino jobs for maids and security guards  as the best they can provide their low-income constituents, even though I see  no indication that this is what the people of Richmond support. 
               
              Far more  promising is the job-generating capacity of working parks like the Presidio and  Fort Baker. In Fort Baker, along with a Coast Guard station, marina and the Bay Area Discovery Museum, there is Cavallo Point  Lodge, a destination luxury resort that was built on a historic site within the  park but that didn't require loss of public ownership, affecting offshore  habitat, paving over a major watershed, installing thousands of slot machines  or generating traffic to achieve success.  
               
              While our  recession-and addiction-plagued city and state already have dozens of casinos,  there's only one large green space left on the West Coast's largest estuary  that could act as a local and world center for providing natural ecosystem  services, youth recreation, education, jobs and opportunities as could Point  Molate Park. 
               
              Build waterfront  park, not homes, at Point MolateBy David Helvarg 
               
              July  18, 2016 Updated: July 18, 2016 8:41pm  
                             
                
              Photo:  Paul Chinn, The Chronicle  
               
              Pipelines  from the old Navy fuel depot line a pier at Point Molate in Richmond, Calif. on  Friday, July 15, 2016.  
               
              In the wake of  the firing of the executive director of the California Coastal Commission  earlier this year, real-estate interests in the state seem emboldened to push  for badly thought out but highly lucrative waterfront developments. 
               
              A case in point  is my town of Richmond. Six years ago, the people of Richmond voted 58 percent to 42 percent to stop a mega-casino  development planned for Point Molate, a 422-acre natural headland and historic  wine port that, in the words of one local, “is the most beautiful part of the  Bay Area no one’s ever heard of.” 
               
              The casino  developer, not seeming to understand his own business model that when you  gamble you lose, went on to sue the city. For six years, federal judges have  ruled against him, his Upstream development company and the tribe they’d  partnered with including in 2015 when they were ordered to pay close to $2  million in attorney’s fees to the city. 
               
              Yet now Richmond  Mayor Tom Butt is working to cut a deal that has included two city council  closed sessions in June and one July 19 with the former casino developer, Jim  Levine. Apparently the mayor hopes to settle the suit the city’s been winning  by giving part of Richmond’s greatest natural resource back to Levine. 
               
              Point Molate
            
                
             
            Former Navy fuel depot holds promise for new use in Richmond  
               
              Ongoing private  discussions have taken place between the mayor, Levine and others to put 1,100  high-income housing units on Point Molate’s isolated and largely inaccessible  peninsular headland. The five proposed housing clusters would include  Marin-view mini-mansions on the slopes of the only intact California coastal  grasslands watershed in the East Bay that runs down to San Francisco Bay’s  healthiest offshore eel grass beds. 
               
              In 2014, former  mayor and now Richmond City Councilmember Gayle McGlaughlin opened up a public  beach park at Point Molate for the first time in a decade. She also established  a Point Molate Community Advisory Committee made up of a dozen local citizens  who have volunteered their time, efforts and oversight for six years. At the  same time, Citizens for a Sustainable Point Molate, a volunteer group that I  work with, has been sponsoring daylong field trips for Richmond high school  classes that have helped inspire and reconnect our young people with their  waterfront while learning about science, health, botany and biology. Some  students saw their first seals, deer and other native wildlife. For most of the  students, this has been a first-time exposure that’s elicited excited feedback  including whoops of joy when, in the middle of an outdoor class, an osprey  snagged a fish out of the water with its talons. 
               
              Most people  don’t associate our low-income city with world-class history and natural  wonders but those of us who’ve been working to protect Point Molate for the  last decade have a vision on how to develop the site as a self-supporting  waterfront park, along with a thriving commercial and retail district.  Unfortunately, the city attorney has repeatedly warned the advisory committee not  to entertain any development plans because of Levine’s ongoing litigation while  the mayor complains that he has to take precipitous action because, “nothing is  happening at Point Molate.” 
               
              The mayor met  with PG&E last year and was told it would cost at least $25 million to  bring power onto Point Molate, a good argument for putting private housing on  the land to pay for that type of costly capital improvement. When the Trust for  Public Land brought in the Urban Land Institute for a quick evaluation (paid for  by the trust and the city) Mayor Butt told them that, given PG&Es projected  energy costs, housing would be the only practical development plan. The Urban  Land Institute provided two plans that reflected the mayor’s wishes for  housing, although not in the native grassland watershed or other high-value  natural resource areas that the Levine plan has marked for development. 
               
              However Mark  Howe, a member of the advisory council and a businessman who leases out  commercial properties in Richmond, found an existing PG&E power line that  runs through Chevron’s property that could re-energize Point Molate for around  $300,000. This lesser cost could be covered by temporarily leasing some of the  existing buildings and paved spaces on site until a public and transparent plan  for sustainably developing this bay area wonder is completed, a plan that might  also incorporate clean energy generated by wind or solar. 
               
              In addition,  rejecting the idea of private housing clusters where they don’t belong would  reduce a huge liability risk associated with Chevron’s giant aging oil refinery  that sits just over Point Molate’s ridgeline. 
               
              A far more  credible plan might focus on Point Molate’s existing historic district that  could and should be repurposed from the state’s original wine industry port  (not far from the state’s last whaling station) to something both useful and  fabulous. This 20-acre plus site includes the red brick Winehaven Castle and an  adjacent turn-of-the-20th-century workers village. It has potential for a Mount  Tamalpais-bayview hotel, food and wine retail shops, start-up offices, a plant  nursery, nature center, etc. As a visitor destination, it would have increased  value being surrounded by a waterfront park, an extended Bay Trail, hiking  trails, native grasslands and family camping sites. 
               
              Among those who  have expressed interest in managing these natural treasures are the East Bay  Regional Parks District and the Trust for Public Lands, while San Francisco  State’s Romberg Marine Lab and the nonprofit Watershed Project hope to continue  to study and restore Point Molate’s offshore eelgrass beds and historic oyster  reefs. A coalition of Richmond and Bay Area political and conservation groups  are also coalescing in opposition to the mayor’s planned housing deal with a  developer whose previous plans were overwhelmingly rejected by voters. 
               
              Instead all  interested parties could and should work through a democratically elected  community trust for Point Molate involving all the city’s stakeholders, and not  least our students and youth who have the greatest stake in what kind of  resources and opportunities they inherit. All that’s needed to restore Point  Molate’s unique gifts to the people of Richmond and the world is democracy,  imagination and a city council willing to stand up to its mayor. 
   
  David Helvarg is  a Richmond resident, executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean conservation  group, and the author of “The Golden Shore — California’s Love Affair with the Sea.”  | 
            |