The report Perspectives on Helping  Low-Income Californians Afford Housing published by the Legislative  Analyst’s Office, the California Legislature’s Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy  Advisor, concludes that “…the key remedy to California’s housing challenges is  a substantial increase in private home building in the state’s coastal urban  communities.” See summary below: 
               
 "California  has a serious housing shortage. California’s housing costs, consequently, have  been rising rapidly for decades. These high housing costs make it difficult for  many Californians to find housing that is affordable and that meets their  needs, forcing them to make serious trade–offs in order to live in California.  
 
In our  March 2015 report, California’s  High Housing Costs: Causes and Consequences, we outlined the  evidence for California’s housing shortage and discussed its major  ramifications. We also suggested that the key remedy to California’s housing  challenges is a substantial increase in private home building in the state’s  coastal urban communities. An expansion of California’s housing supply would  offer widespread benefits to Californians, as well as those who wish to live in  California but cannot afford to do so.  
 
Some  fear, however, that these benefits would not extend to low–income Californians.  Because most new construction is targeted at higher–income households, it is  often assumed that new construction does not increase the supply of lower–end  housing. In addition, some worry that construction of market–rate housing in  low–income neighborhoods leads to displacement of low–income households. In  response, some have questioned whether efforts to increase private housing  development are prudent. These observers suggest that policy makers instead  focus on expanding government programs that aim to help low–income Californians  afford housing.  
 
In this  follow up to California’s  High Housing Costs, we offer additional evidence that facilitating  more private housing development in the state’s coastal urban communities would  help make housing more affordable for low–income Californians. Existing  affordable housing programs assist only a small proportion of low–income  Californians. Most low–income Californians receive little or no assistance.  Expanding affordable housing programs to help these households likely would be  extremely challenging and prohibitively expensive. It may be best to focus  these programs on Californians with more specialized housing needs—such as  homeless individuals and families or persons with significant physical and  mental health challenges.  
 
Encouraging  additional private housing construction can help the many low–income  Californians who do not receive assistance. Considerable evidence suggests that  construction of market–rate housing reduces housing costs for low–income households  and, consequently, helps to mitigate displacement in many cases. Bringing about  more private home building, however, would be no easy task, requiring state and  local policy makers to confront very challenging issues and taking many years  to come to fruition. Despite these difficulties, these efforts could provide  significant widespread benefits: lower housing costs for millions of  Californians."  
 
 Although the Report describes rent control as a policy that  some local governments are pursuing, it does not advocate rent control as a  solution.  |